Found quite a few have been given for a few at MSKCC … for example. * SCR_017850<https://scicrunch.org/resources/Any/search?q=SCR_017850&l=SCR_017850> - Molecular Cytogenetics Core Facility * SCR_017691<https://scicrunch.org/resources/Any/search?q=SCR_017691&l=SCR_017691> - Antibody & Bioresource Core Facility * SCR_017853<https://scicrunch.org/resources/Any/search?q=SCR_017853&l=SCR_017853> - Investigational Products Support Core Facility From: Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> Date: Tuesday, June 2, 2020 at 11:48 AM To: "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe)" <email obscured>> Subject: We have an RRID number We have an RRID number But cannot find other cores with RRID numbers (yet) Only matters if we want to define the structure of the core RRID [A screenshot of a cell phone Description automatically generated]
Posts in Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe)
We have an RRID number But cannot find other cores with RRID numbers (yet) Only matters if we want to define the structure of the core RRID [A screenshot of a cell phone Description automatically generated]

Sure!! Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St<x-apple-data-detectors://1/1> Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054<x-apple-data-detectors://2/0> T 713-563-3301<tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276<tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured><email obscured>> On Jan 22, 2020, at 12:04 PM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: I'm so glad you are attending. We have to make time for a drink. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/22/20, 1:01 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Thanks for the clarification! Obviously I was thinking in my type of experiments, trying to identify new markers upon treatment with certain agents. We used to have a Core here for identification of cell lines, but I am not sure of it is still operating. Thanks! And see you soon at ABRF meeting! Laura Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former Clinical Research Committee 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> On 1/21/20, 11:22 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Thanks Laura and sorry for the confusion. What I am looking for is a way to tell cell line apart if they come from the same parent. For human lines that are from different people, STR profiles are perfect ... but for lines derived from the same original (parent) line ... there is currently no easy way to tell the difference between parent line A and children lines A1, A2 much less grandchild A1.3. Make sense ... If it was a hybridoma, I would just sequence the CDRs. A colleague of mine and I were thinking of inserting a "DNA barcode" in the lines, probably via CRISPR so we can put in as innocuous a site as possible, but before developing a solving I was really hoping one already existed ... so I thought I would poll this group ... All about cell line authentication ... one of the many building blocks needed for RnR. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/21/20, 7:39 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: So, do you need to differentiate the parent cells from the ones resulted from the division or proliferating? May be is not your question. What about staining with CFSE a bunch of cells and let them to divide and sort the different peaks (usually 7, at least in normal cells such as T cells proliferating) by FACS. The mean fluorescence as you know is going lower with each division. Is that what you need? Depending on the proliferation time you will be able to separate the last progeny, as well as the intermediate. In normal T cells after 5 days you can recover cells from each division. Not sure if with a cell line you could do the same. Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> In order to continue obtaining Core support in a challenging environment, it is crucial that our users acknowledge the following grants in all publications (see following text). Thank you! “This work was supported in part by CCSG grant number P30 CA016672.” iLab-Solutions links: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/service_center/show_external/3631 or: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/account/login If you do not already have an iLab account please create one prior to sample submission On 1/21/20, 8:15 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. Question ... Does anyone know of a way to reliably differentiate between decedents / children of a cell line as well as the parent? One solution is to insert a plasmid to serve as an internal barcode, but maybe there are other options ... ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/34QaaQAFJeqW0i9xRxpxdF Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/4ZEue7isDB6HQkv9uRZ5tU Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1j7HL1WOCC1BbXs7GhjNay Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/44UltrTro1WBzrxDy3awjP Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/52Q3RJen2WgffYVLkXysrf Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
I'm so glad you are attending. We have to make time for a drink. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/22/20, 1:01 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Thanks for the clarification! Obviously I was thinking in my type of experiments, trying to identify new markers upon treatment with certain agents. We used to have a Core here for identification of cell lines, but I am not sure of it is still operating. Thanks! And see you soon at ABRF meeting! Laura Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former Clinical Research Committee 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> On 1/21/20, 11:22 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Thanks Laura and sorry for the confusion. What I am looking for is a way to tell cell line apart if they come from the same parent. For human lines that are from different people, STR profiles are perfect ... but for lines derived from the same original (parent) line ... there is currently no easy way to tell the difference between parent line A and children lines A1, A2 much less grandchild A1.3. Make sense ... If it was a hybridoma, I would just sequence the CDRs. A colleague of mine and I were thinking of inserting a "DNA barcode" in the lines, probably via CRISPR so we can put in as innocuous a site as possible, but before developing a solving I was really hoping one already existed ... so I thought I would poll this group ... All about cell line authentication ... one of the many building blocks needed for RnR. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/21/20, 7:39 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: So, do you need to differentiate the parent cells from the ones resulted from the division or proliferating? May be is not your question. What about staining with CFSE a bunch of cells and let them to divide and sort the different peaks (usually 7, at least in normal cells such as T cells proliferating) by FACS. The mean fluorescence as you know is going lower with each division. Is that what you need? Depending on the proliferation time you will be able to separate the last progeny, as well as the intermediate. In normal T cells after 5 days you can recover cells from each division. Not sure if with a cell line you could do the same. Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> In order to continue obtaining Core support in a challenging environment, it is crucial that our users acknowledge the following grants in all publications (see following text). Thank you! “This work was supported in part by CCSG grant number P30 CA016672.” iLab-Solutions links: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/service_center/show_external/3631 or: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/account/login If you do not already have an iLab account please create one prior to sample submission On 1/21/20, 8:15 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. Question ... Does anyone know of a way to reliably differentiate between decedents / children of a cell line as well as the parent? One solution is to insert a plasmid to serve as an internal barcode, but maybe there are other options ... ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/34QaaQAFJeqW0i9xRxpxdF Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/4ZEue7isDB6HQkv9uRZ5tU Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1j7HL1WOCC1BbXs7GhjNay Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/44UltrTro1WBzrxDy3awjP Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe

Thanks for the clarification! Obviously I was thinking in my type of experiments, trying to identify new markers upon treatment with certain agents. We used to have a Core here for identification of cell lines, but I am not sure of it is still operating. Thanks! And see you soon at ABRF meeting! Laura Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former Clinical Research Committee 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> On 1/21/20, 11:22 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Thanks Laura and sorry for the confusion. What I am looking for is a way to tell cell line apart if they come from the same parent. For human lines that are from different people, STR profiles are perfect ... but for lines derived from the same original (parent) line ... there is currently no easy way to tell the difference between parent line A and children lines A1, A2 much less grandchild A1.3. Make sense ... If it was a hybridoma, I would just sequence the CDRs. A colleague of mine and I were thinking of inserting a "DNA barcode" in the lines, probably via CRISPR so we can put in as innocuous a site as possible, but before developing a solving I was really hoping one already existed ... so I thought I would poll this group ... All about cell line authentication ... one of the many building blocks needed for RnR. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/21/20, 7:39 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: So, do you need to differentiate the parent cells from the ones resulted from the division or proliferating? May be is not your question. What about staining with CFSE a bunch of cells and let them to divide and sort the different peaks (usually 7, at least in normal cells such as T cells proliferating) by FACS. The mean fluorescence as you know is going lower with each division. Is that what you need? Depending on the proliferation time you will be able to separate the last progeny, as well as the intermediate. In normal T cells after 5 days you can recover cells from each division. Not sure if with a cell line you could do the same. Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> In order to continue obtaining Core support in a challenging environment, it is crucial that our users acknowledge the following grants in all publications (see following text). Thank you! “This work was supported in part by CCSG grant number P30 CA016672.” iLab-Solutions links: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/service_center/show_external/3631 or: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/account/login If you do not already have an iLab account please create one prior to sample submission On 1/21/20, 8:15 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. Question ... Does anyone know of a way to reliably differentiate between decedents / children of a cell line as well as the parent? One solution is to insert a plasmid to serve as an internal barcode, but maybe there are other options ... ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/34QaaQAFJeqW0i9xRxpxdF Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/4ZEue7isDB6HQkv9uRZ5tU Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1j7HL1WOCC1BbXs7GhjNay Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
Thanks Laura and sorry for the confusion. What I am looking for is a way to tell cell line apart if they come from the same parent. For human lines that are from different people, STR profiles are perfect ... but for lines derived from the same original (parent) line ... there is currently no easy way to tell the difference between parent line A and children lines A1, A2 much less grandchild A1.3. Make sense ... If it was a hybridoma, I would just sequence the CDRs. A colleague of mine and I were thinking of inserting a "DNA barcode" in the lines, probably via CRISPR so we can put in as innocuous a site as possible, but before developing a solving I was really hoping one already existed ... so I thought I would poll this group ... All about cell line authentication ... one of the many building blocks needed for RnR. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/21/20, 7:39 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: So, do you need to differentiate the parent cells from the ones resulted from the division or proliferating? May be is not your question. What about staining with CFSE a bunch of cells and let them to divide and sort the different peaks (usually 7, at least in normal cells such as T cells proliferating) by FACS. The mean fluorescence as you know is going lower with each division. Is that what you need? Depending on the proliferation time you will be able to separate the last progeny, as well as the intermediate. In normal T cells after 5 days you can recover cells from each division. Not sure if with a cell line you could do the same. Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> In order to continue obtaining Core support in a challenging environment, it is crucial that our users acknowledge the following grants in all publications (see following text). Thank you! “This work was supported in part by CCSG grant number P30 CA016672.” iLab-Solutions links: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/service_center/show_external/3631 or: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/account/login If you do not already have an iLab account please create one prior to sample submission On 1/21/20, 8:15 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. Question ... Does anyone know of a way to reliably differentiate between decedents / children of a cell line as well as the parent? One solution is to insert a plasmid to serve as an internal barcode, but maybe there are other options ... ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/34QaaQAFJeqW0i9xRxpxdF Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/4ZEue7isDB6HQkv9uRZ5tU Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe

So, do you need to differentiate the parent cells from the ones resulted from the division or proliferating? May be is not your question. What about staining with CFSE a bunch of cells and let them to divide and sort the different peaks (usually 7, at least in normal cells such as T cells proliferating) by FACS. The mean fluorescence as you know is going lower with each division. Is that what you need? Depending on the proliferation time you will be able to separate the last progeny, as well as the intermediate. In normal T cells after 5 days you can recover cells from each division. Not sure if with a cell line you could do the same. Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> In order to continue obtaining Core support in a challenging environment, it is crucial that our users acknowledge the following grants in all publications (see following text). Thank you! “This work was supported in part by CCSG grant number P30 CA016672.” iLab-Solutions links: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/service_center/show_external/3631 or: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/account/login If you do not already have an iLab account please create one prior to sample submission On 1/21/20, 8:15 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. Question ... Does anyone know of a way to reliably differentiate between decedents / children of a cell line as well as the parent? One solution is to insert a plasmid to serve as an internal barcode, but maybe there are other options ... ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/34QaaQAFJeqW0i9xRxpxdF Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
I don't think we have here. Laura Bover, PhD Professor Director Monoclonal Antibody Core Facility University of Texas M.D.Anderson Cancer Center Associate member of The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences at Houston Member of the Scientific Review Committee 2 (former CRC 2) Member of the Steering Committee of the Immunology Program GSBS Immunology Department/ Genomics Medicine Department 7455 Fannin St Room 1SCR4.2021 Houston- TX 77054 T 713-563-3301 <tel:713-563-3301> F 713-563-3276 <tel:713-563-3276> <email obscured> In order to continue obtaining Core support in a challenging environment, it is crucial that our users acknowledge the following grants in all publications (see following text). Thank you! “This work was supported in part by CCSG grant number P30 CA016672.” iLab-Solutions links: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/service_center/show_external/3631 or: https://mdanderson.ilabsolutions.com/account/login If you do not already have an iLab account please create one prior to sample submission On 1/21/20, 8:09 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. Question ... How many of your institutions would find a mouse STR service that actually tells the difference between cell lines from the same strain useful? ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/2GelNSWkF0ReLhUXplDIcv Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
Question ... Does anyone know of a way to reliably differentiate between decedents / children of a cell line as well as the parent? One solution is to insert a plasmid to serve as an internal barcode, but maybe there are other options ...
Question ... How many of your institutions would find a mouse STR service that actually tells the difference between cell lines from the same strain useful?
Dear ABRF Core Rigor and Reproducibility Discussion Forum Members, I just wanted to remind all of this that this is here for us to share information, announce opportunities (e.g. the R2T game and the ABRF SW) focused on RnR (and T), as well as ask questions, field ideas and even vent. We are a pretty quite group ... but all share a common interest. Hope everyone thinks about posting to this forum, shareing it with others and by doing so, making each of us a bit wiser.
Frances
Thanks Susan for sharing. Looks interesting. I shared it with the people here that make sure the trainees are "trained" in R2T. Frances ZRC 1563 Office 646-888-2354 Mobile 516-967-0656 On 1/20/20, 4:34 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Meyn, Susan M" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Dear Colleagues, This may be of interest to many of you, a fun way to incorporate some R2T training: Kaizen is a gamified online training program for academic researchers developed at UAB. The first game focuses on Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency. The game begins February 17 and lasts one month; there will be teamwork and prizes, all enabled by the Kaizen app. And, its free! More details and link to registration (deadline is January 31) form https://edgeforscholars.org/game-on-join-kaizen-to-score-rigor-reproducibility-training-points/ Susan Meyn | Director for Research Resources & Strategy Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Office of Research <http://www.vumc.org/oor/> Twitter: @VUMCResearch | 615.322.0470 | <email obscured><email obscured>> ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/4i3jVLl79kkDEpMz2TTjEI Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe

Dear Colleagues, This may be of interest to many of you, a fun way to incorporate some R2T training: Kaizen is a gamified online training program for academic researchers developed at UAB. The first game focuses on Rigor, Reproducibility, and Transparency. The game begins February 17 and lasts one month; there will be teamwork and prizes, all enabled by the Kaizen app. And, its free! More details and link to registration (deadline is January 31) form https://edgeforscholars.org/game-on-join-kaizen-to-score-rigor-reproducibility-training-points/ Susan Meyn | Director for Research Resources & Strategy Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Office of Research <http://www.vumc.org/oor/> Twitter: @VUMCResearch | 615.322.0470 | <email obscured><email obscured>>
s.meyn
Invitation to attend the Essential Principles for Core Scientists satellite workshop at ABRF2020
Posted at
Dear Colleagues, I invite you to consider signing up to attend this workshop which we believe has broad value to ABRF members! The full day "Essential Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization" workshop features a morning plenary session focused on experimental design including essential biostatistics principles. In the afternoon, there are two concurrent sessions: one focused on Flow Cytometry relevant experimental design, and the other on how laboratory sustainability intersects with principles of scientific rigor and reproducibility. We have a slate of outstanding speakers to lead these sessions: Morning session focused on general experimental design and biostatistics features: Josh Starmer PhD, Assistant Professor, Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine Afternoon concurrent breakout for Flow Cytometry experimental design features: * Mehrnoosh Abshari, Head, Combined Technical Research Core, NIH-National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research * Dave Adams, Managing Director, Biomedical Research Core Facilities Flow Cytometry Core, University of Michigan Medical School * Dagna Sheerar, Facility Manager, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Laboratory * Sherry Thornton Director, Cincinnati Children's Research Flow Cytometry Core, Associate Professor, University of Cincinnati Department of Pediatrics Afternoon concurrent breakout for Sustainability and Rigor/Reproducibility features: Kathryn A. Ramirez-Aguilar, Ph.D., CU Green Labs Program Manager, Environmental Center, University of Colorado Boulder More details are posted on the ABRF2020 Satellite Workshop page<https://conf.abrf.org/program/satellite-workshops/>; Essential Principles SW1 is listed at the top of the page. Please share this to any you think would benefit from attending this innovative satellite workshop. Looking forward to seeing many of you at ABRF 2020! Susan Meyn | Director for Research Resources & Strategy Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Office of Research <http://www.vumc.org/oor/> Twitter: @VUMCResearch | 615.322.0470 | <email obscured><email obscured>>
Wonderful! On 10/28/19, 1:11 PM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: I will probably go. This time I will not be in Argentina Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: > > Sure > > ABRF2020 > Feb 29th - March 3rd > Palm Springs, CA > > https://conf.abrf.org/ > > Registration should open soon. > > > > On 10/28/19, 10:33 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: > > Frances please se d me the dates of ABRF 2020. I probably missed that from previous emails because many of those mails fall in quarantine and after 7 dates deleted. And I was on vacations 21 days in September. > MDAnderson’s rules on security are stricter recently. > Thanks!! > Laura > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: >> >> WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. >> >> Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. >> >> We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who know personally are passionate about the topic and encourage any posts, be they for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the later, the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: >> >> 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." >> >> 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." >> >> Looking forward to seeing everyone there! >> >> Frances >> >> ―― >> View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1Z8TPjT3nbmWWVIz7XILW >> Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe > The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. > > ―― > View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1IWm8gFe4NLj4fqQR6OM6b > Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe > > > > ―― > View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/6fFz02UzR1lDoBfLqMK9Vm > Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/5qpWXpD7Of1YiECwvtIhnL Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe

I will probably go. This time I will not be in Argentina Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: > > Sure > > ABRF2020 > Feb 29th - March 3rd > Palm Springs, CA > > https://conf.abrf.org/ > > Registration should open soon. > > > > On 10/28/19, 10:33 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: > > Frances please se d me the dates of ABRF 2020. I probably missed that from previous emails because many of those mails fall in quarantine and after 7 dates deleted. And I was on vacations 21 days in September. > MDAnderson’s rules on security are stricter recently. > Thanks!! > Laura > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Oct 28, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: >> >> WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. >> >> Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. >> >> We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who know personally are passionate about the topic and encourage any posts, be they for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the later, the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: >> >> 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." >> >> 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." >> >> Looking forward to seeing everyone there! >> >> Frances >> >> ―― >> View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1Z8TPjT3nbmWWVIz7XILW >> Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe > The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. > > ―― > View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1IWm8gFe4NLj4fqQR6OM6b > Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe > > > > ―― > View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/6fFz02UzR1lDoBfLqMK9Vm > Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
Sure ABRF2020 Feb 29th - March 3rd Palm Springs, CA https://conf.abrf.org/ Registration should open soon. On 10/28/19, 10:33 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Bover,Laura" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Frances please se d me the dates of ABRF 2020. I probably missed that from previous emails because many of those mails fall in quarantine and after 7 dates deleted. And I was on vacations 21 days in September. MDAnderson’s rules on security are stricter recently. Thanks!! Laura Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. > > Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. > > We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who know personally are passionate about the topic and encourage any posts, be they for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the later, the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: > > 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." > > 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." > > Looking forward to seeing everyone there! > > Frances > > ―― > View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1Z8TPjT3nbmWWVIz7XILW > Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems. ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1IWm8gFe4NLj4fqQR6OM6b Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe

Frances please se d me the dates of ABRF 2020. I probably missed that from previous emails because many of those mails fall in quarantine and after 7 dates deleted. And I was on vacations 21 days in September. MDAnderson’s rules on security are stricter recently. Thanks!! Laura Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 28, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Frances Weis-Garcia <email obscured>> wrote: > > WARNING: This email originated from outside of MD Anderson. Please validate the sender's email address before clicking on links or attachments as they may not be safe. > > Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. > > We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who know personally are passionate about the topic and encourage any posts, be they for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the later, the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: > > 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." > > 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." > > Looking forward to seeing everyone there! > > Frances > > ―― > View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1Z8TPjT3nbmWWVIz7XILW > Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged, confidential, and/or protected from disclosure. This e-mail message may contain protected health information (PHI); dissemination of PHI should comply with applicable federal and state laws. If you are not the intended recipient, or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, any further review, disclosure, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message or any attachment (or the information contained therein) is strictly prohibited. If you think that you have received this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete all references to it and its contents from your systems.
Reposting due to poor editing in the first post. This is what I get for rushing. Thank you for your patience ... Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who I know personally are passionate about the topic and I encourage everyone that nothing is too insignificant to post ... be it for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the firsrt one ... the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." Looking forward to seeing everyone there!
Frances __________________ On 10/28/19, 9:12 AM, "Core Rigor and Reproducibility (CoRRe) on behalf of Frances Weis-Garcia" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who know personally are passionate about the topic and encourage any posts, be they for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the later, the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." Looking forward to seeing everyone there! Frances ―― View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1Z8TPjT3nbmWWVIz7XILW Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe
Happy Monday to those on this discussion forum because we do care about Rigor and Reproducibility. We are a quite group of 65 members, but I wanted everyone to know that those who know personally are passionate about the topic and encourage any posts, be they for information purposes, discussions or questions. Speaking to the later, the ABRF Committee on Core Rigor and Reproducibility has organized 2 things at ABRF2020 (https://conf.abrf.org/), specifically: 1.) A satellite workshop entitled " Essential Biostatistics Principles for Core Scientists: Enabling rigorous experimental design, reproducible results and effective data visualization." 2.) A 90 min panel discussion with journal editors entitled "Journals, ABRF and You: Partners Addressing Rigor and Reproducibility." Looking forward to seeing everyone there!
Frances