I agree with Andy - if someone else is willing to pay for those expenses for
the company, it could be done. But that begs the question, why wouldn't that
internal source of funds just buy the equipment outright, then? If you don't
think the company will ever use the equipment enough so that service fees equal
the cost of the equipment, then it is a plus for the institution. But there
still has to be an institutional source of funding willing to cover those fees.
Best,
Julie
On 11/10/20, 8:29 AM, "Core Administrators Network Forum on behalf of Andrew
Wayne Ott" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote:
I don't see why this would be different that if the instrument is bought on
a grant. If services are provided on a recharge model, the cost to operate and
maintain the instrument would be charged at the time of service delivery. Those
costs could not be distributed to other users of the core.
Having said that, I could see a scenario where the institution decides to
"give away" those services in exchange for the contribution. In that case, you
would either need to subsidize the cost to zero, with funds outside the core,
or move those expenses out of the core (i.e. fund on a department account or
similar). Either way you are funding those costs from an source external to the
core. You are not giving away, just charging someone else. Question would be
just how you choose to track.
This could open a huge can of worms as why would an department/school
compensate a company for contributing a piece of equipment, but not a PI for
getting a grant the sites equipment in a core. I would hesitate to pursue that
path unless the cost of the equipment was extremely high, in the strategic plan
of the core, and the resource requirement to provide the services is relatively
small.
Andy
Director of Core Facilities Administration
Office for Research
ph: 847-467-1622
ph: 847-491-3032
email: <email obscured>
Rest of post
-----Original Message-----
From: Core Administrators Network Forum <email obscured>> On Behalf Of
Matt DeVries
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 10:10 AM
To: <email obscured>
Subject: [core administrators network forum] External Company buys the core
an instrument - Free usage forever?
This is an odd scneario I'm having a hard time getting my head around.
Scenario:
An external for profit company wants access to the expertise and resources
of a University's core facility, however they need the work done on a specific
instrument the core does not currently have. The company purchases the
instrument and gives it to the core/university. The core then assumes operating
costs and staffing needs for it. Core is free to roll excess capacity into
their normal operation.
Should the company get free access to that instrument until the original
purchase cost is paid for, or should they get free access to that instrument
forever?
Does the scenario change if the company retains ownership of the instrument
but keeps it on core property? --Matt ―― View topic
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/36bvKxLSVsO2wqTNp94x7N__;!!Dq0X2DkFhyF93HkjWTBQKhk!CXjGbh2wIazdjNroTd_Ji5sgbEq5e4IE-pQtI-w_MCPEzcH2KWFmQ2uaEnVabA5CC3zx$
Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe
――
View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/6iDWkGbj8eiSu3RhbUfKwB
Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe