In my experience the Thermo 3 quads are the best instruments available, very
robust and reliable, title down time, very easy to maintain. plus their
software for data acquisition is very easy to use, very intuitive
Rest of post
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A. Artigues, PhD
Director Mass Spectrometry/Proteomics Lab
Res. Associate Profesor
Dept of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
KU Medical Center
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Apr 4, 2019, at 3:37 PM, Kym Faull
<email obscured><email obscured>>> wrote:
A colleague is considering purchasing an instrument to do primarily
pharmacokinetics of drugs. He seeks advice about the “best” instrument in the
medium-lower price and performance range. A linear trap instrument is one
option, and a triple quad is the other. I told him to should shop for
instruments such as the Agilent instruments, Waters TQD, Thermo TSQ Vantage,
Shimadzu LCMS-8030, and AB Sciex 3200 or 5500? Ease of use, reliability and
minimal downtime and maintenance are important criteria for him. If you have
advice to share with us about these choices, do not hesitate to reply on the
ABRF website or my personal work email which is provided below.
Kym Francis Faull, Ph.D.
Director, Pasarow Mass Spectrometry Laboratory
Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA
Professor Emeritus, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Telephone: (310) 206 7881 (office)
Telephone: (310) 206 7886 (laboratory)
Facsimile: (310) 206 2161
Electronic mail: <email obscured><email obscured>>
<email obscured>>
――
View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/2ZF8Yj4XqncHBuUdBNq6rZ
Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe