Post in Do you want IT content at ABRF 2017: ABRF IT Discussion Forum: ABRF Discussion Forums

I like data lifecycle management and policies as a topic. As a service and support provider I have to map the requirements of the cores for data lifecycle to underlying infrastructure and services that optimize budget, risk tolerance, performance characteristics, manageability etc at various stages. I am also interested in exploring the tension and gaps between 'traditional' institutional IT organizations/solutions and 'research IT' needs. These issues can be around security, agility/flexibility, cost/chargeback models, and central services such as storage or compute. I think the challenges vary by individual institution as well as type of institutions (e.g. big commercial, hospital, university). The NSF seems to be supporting approaches such as science DMZ (http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2016/nsf16567/nsf16567.htm) what institutions have initiatives for these solutions and a commitment to research computing support. How is that working for you? The closest thing to this discussion we've had at ABRF or chapter meetings have been Chris Dagdigian's talks and subsequent discussion. I believe his sessions were well received. Just a reference here for those that didn't see it: http://www.slideshare.net/chrisdag/bioit-for-core-facility-managers

-James -- James VanEe, IT Director Institute of Biotechnology Biotechnology Resource Center 171 Biotech Bldg, CU, Ithaca NY 14853 (607) 254-4862 (fax4847) http://www.biotech.cornell.edu/brc/bio-it http://www.abrf.org On 8/10/16, 3:50 PM, "ABRF IT Discussion Forum on behalf of White, Amanda (Nicole)" <email obscured> on behalf of <email obscured>> wrote: >Frances- > >Just my thoughts on this. > >I vote (and others please add your thoughts) to have a roundtable discussion on a topic that affects the cores in relation to IT issues, ex. Data management policies, managing software updated connected to third party instrumentation, providing security to data, managing LIMS, etc. > >Whatever the topic may be. I am not sure with this group being new there is enough traction to pull in a speaker but rather most would benefit from a good-hearty discussion on IT issues that affect core facilities. > >Any other thoughts on this? > >Best, >Nicole > >-----Original Message----- >From: ABRF IT Discussion Forum <email obscured>] On Behalf Of Frances Weis-Garcia >Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 3:10 PM >To: <email obscured> >Subject: Re: [ABRF IT] Do you want IT content at ABRF 2017 > >This line of thought seems to have lost momentum. > >Does this mean that no one doing IT related things for cores / researchers want a session at the annual meeting focused on their needs? Or are you just enjoying your summer to much? Hope it is the later. > >Either way ... please tell me because people are vying for time at the meeting and I am 99% sure they are holding you guys a slot. > >On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Quaye, Wendye <email obscured>> >wrote: > >> I think this is a good idea. >> >> Maybe about Public Access to Research Data? >> >> >> Wendye >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ABRF IT Discussion Forum <email obscured>] On >> Behalf Of Frances Weis-Garcia >> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 12:57 PM >> To: <email obscured> >> Subject: [ABRF IT] Do you want IT content at ABRF 2017 >> >> Just asked if there is space in the ABRF2017 program for an IT session >> and looks like there is ... so ... what would should it be on? >> >> >> Right now we could organize a 60 min invited speaker slot or a 75 min >> round table session. If the topic lends itself to it, we could ask >> for 90 min with a 45 min where a person/people give short talks >> followed by 45 min for a round table discussion. >> >> In thinking about this, keep in mind that core facility people are >> there, directors, staff, administrators ... an if possible it would be >> great to pick a topic that cores from your "world" into theirs even >> just a little bit. >> >> What do you guys think? >> Interested? >> ―― >> View topic >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__list.abrf.org_r_to >> pic_zmHzrxPuOy7IdiJhy90G1&d=CwIFaQ&c=P0c35rBvlN7D8BNx7kSJTg&r=6W3WuyA4 >> b9wmmWx_zL10i-pPHTEcDlnUPPywP_o5X1s&m=IORpMCuKt2i0kLTkY_C3VkB9IWX8eIsh >> -FOtvD0hirM&s=cKUeoNJ_8PglM6OYlF3Esw2gK_4Dnz44M_8NOl7agIw&e= >> Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe >> >> >> ―― >> View topic >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__list.abrf.org_r_to >> pic_4rtSD63gONf8e3EJWvEnt7&d=CwIFaQ&c=P0c35rBvlN7D8BNx7kSJTg&r=6W3WuyA >> 4b9wmmWx_zL10i-pPHTEcDlnUPPywP_o5X1s&m=IORpMCuKt2i0kLTkY_C3VkB9IWX8eIs >> h-FOtvD0hirM&s=gykuFjqipQd7qi1IguPR6-Wj7o4hg90WQButT324LaM&e= >> Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe >> >> > >―― >View topic https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__list.abrf.org_r_topic_4IW3NsayIY4oKeNXPX4GzQ&d=CwIFaQ&c=P0c35rBvlN7D8BNx7kSJTg&r=6W3WuyA4b9wmmWx_zL10i-pPHTEcDlnUPPywP_o5X1s&m=IORpMCuKt2i0kLTkY_C3VkB9IWX8eIsh-FOtvD0hirM&s=KmjGTl6TEm6gaiTNAotDxJtdV_hSqTwFoiTiqAQ3MXQ&e= >Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe > > >―― >View topic http://list.abrf.org/r/topic/1XY8nOz5g3ITu6hawBY39y >Leave group <email obscured>?Subject=Unsubscribe >